Showing posts with label Producer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Producer. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

U2 TO WORK ON NEW ALBUM SOON, RYAN TEDDER SAYS MAKING IT "WILL BE EASIER"


Ryan Tedder and U2


In an interview today with the Italian music news site Rockol, Ryan Tedder said U2 asked him to meet them in Los Angeles to start work on U2's next album.
"I spoke to them just last week. We will work together on some new pieces when I am in Los Angeles," Tedder told Rockol.
 "I think it's their intention to make a record the last two. It will be easier. You know, it's like a pendulum.
When you make a very produced album, with so many instruments in it, the next project you want it more what if the disc had the sound of four musicians playing in a room?" Tedder, whose songwriting, production and performance credits on hits for U2, Beyoncé, Madonna, Adele and Taylor Swift have elevated him to an elite status, is also man to releasing a new One Republic album next month and a new tour in the summer of 2020.
"Working with a band like U2," comes with difculties Tedder said in his interview with the Italian language site Rockoi. "Bono and The Edge are like conductors. They assemble the songs by taking the melody from a demo, the chords from another, the strings from a third audition. With them a song is never nished."
 "U2 are the best group on the planet, but with them it is not uncommon to produce 70 versions of a single song," Tedder said. There is no indication at this time as to when Tedder will be in Los Angeles to work with U2. One Republic has not announced any performances for Los Angeles for t U2's The Joshua Tree Tour 2019 begins November 8 in Auckland, New Zealand.
 As a matter of speculation only, U2 might choose to conduct some tour rehearsals in and could work on new songs with Tedder as soon as next month. Tedder's previous credits with U2 are for production and performance on Songs of Innocence (2014) and Songs of Experience (2017). Though uncredited as a songwriter said he and One Republic bandmate Brent Kutzle wrote part of U2's song "Summer of Love."

source:@U2

Friday, January 6, 2012

U2 Producer Steve Lillywhite on the Alchemy of Hit-Making


Newly honoured record producer discusses working with Irish gigastars



Record producer Steve Lillywhite has been awarded a CBE in the 2012 New Year Honours list. Born in 1955, Lillywhite started his career in the late 1970s working with new wave and post-punk bands such as XTC and Siouxsie & The Banshees. He went on to produce everyone from Peter Gabriel and Talking Heads to Morrissey and Kirsty MacColl, to whom he was once married. His most enduring relationship, however, is with U2. It began with Lillywhite producing their 1980 debut album, Boy, and has continued to the present day. Here he recalls being in the studio as their 2004 hit, “Vertigo”, came together...

When I got brought in to produce How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb everyone was feeling a bit low. The band had done a fair bit of recording with another producer [Chris Thomas] and they decided it was time to change the team around. I came over to Dublin and they played me what they’d done, which included a song called "Native Son" that was marked down to be the first single. I liked the song, but I felt that it could be recorded with a bit more energy so I asked them to re-record it. I set them up in a completely different way to how they’d been recording up to this point, put the drums in a different place, and I changed the sound completely. It was still the same song, but I took them out of their comfort zone.

The band started jamming it and it was really coming together, sounding great. I said to Bono, who was sitting behind me in the control room, "Why don’t you go out there and do a live vocal? That way we’ll really be able to tell how it’s going." He goes out there, we get him set up, and the band start playing. He starts singing "Native Son", and pretty much by the first chorus he puts the microphone down and says, "Nah, I can’t sing that. That’s not good enough." 

Basically, the moment he started singing the song with the band, Bono projected himself a year into the future, on a stage at Madison Square Garden, and he suddenly realised he couldn’t sing it with the passion he really wanted. Bono has this great knack, which I’ve never really seen with anyone else, of putting a song in the set as he’s writing it. He’s thinking, ‘Ooh, this could replace such-and-such; or this could be a great opener.’ He looks at the album as being the tour as well, and the last thing they want to do is a tour that’s embarrassing when they play the new album. Most bands from their era, that’s the reality: the crowd just go crazy for the hits. U2 manage to still play half a dozen songs off the new album every time and it really works. 

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Man on the Train

Some months ago, we came to know that Larry Mullen Jnr was starring a movie. The name of the film is Man On The Train,  directed by Mary McGuckian ( Inconceivable).Larry's co-stars are Donald Sutherland and Graham Greene. It`s a re-make of a 2002 French film (L'homme du train starred by Johnny Halliday)
and it`s an Ireland-Canada co-production. Though it`s not the first time he acts in a film (he and Bono appeared in Phil Joanau's 1999 film Entropy), this will be his first starring role. When Bono was asked what he thought of his bandmate debut by the Canadian media, he said: "You know what? He`s been acting the bollocks for years..." 
 Now Pembridge Pictures has  shown the first stills of the movie:





  
Larry also composed the film`s original score together with Simon Clime. There`s still no date for its premiere.

www.pembridgepictures.com///popgoesthenews.blogspot.com///www.atu2.com

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Unimpressed with first sight of U2



Chris Blackwell, founder of Island Records, has admitted he was not a fan of U2 when he first saw them live in a London pub.

The label boss was reminiscing in a wide-ranging interview with US radio network NPR's show 'Weekend Edition' on Saturday (Dec. 18),Blackwell said: "I didn't love the music. It was a little rinky-dink, but I believed in them."

Thankfully for the Irish group, Blackwell followed with his instinct and signed them, sticking with them through some lean times until they secured global fame. Nowadays, though, the industry veteran mourns the loss of identity for today's labels.

"I don't know what record labels there are now that mean what they used to be to me when I was a fan," he said. "For example, Blue Note Records was a guarantee of quality. They signed great musicians, and they recorded them absolutely brilliantly. That can happen when you're independent. When it's a major company, they can't do that in the same way. It's changed really a great deal, because also people don't even see a label."

For new artists, Blackwell advises they show patience and own rights to their music. "They can sell their music; they can market themselves on the Web. Takes a long time, because it's sort of going bit by bit, but they can promote their concerts and they can gather email addresses or Facebook pages ... and grow like that," he said. "They don't need to give that up to a record label, which happened in the old days."

http://music.aol.co.uk

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Daniel Lanois Talks About NLOTH



Over the last 25 years Daniel Lanois has produced landmark albums for U2, Bob Dylan, Willie Nelson and Peter Gabriel, among many others. Last year — around the time he started to craft the album Le Noise with Neil Young — Lanois began writing his memoirs. The result, Soul Mining: A Musical Life, came out November 9. Co-written with Keisha Kalfin, the book jumps from era to era non-chronologically, focusing on some of Lanois' greatest records. "I tend to think in a non-linear way," Lanois tells Rolling Stone. "And chronology doesn't come into play for the creation of music, so I decided to work that way. It's probably also just the acid kicking back in."



Lanois isn't involved with any of U2's upcoming projects, but he says he keeps in regular touch with Bono. "Bono took advantage of his back injury and brought the band into the studio," Lanois says. "I haven't heard anything yet, but I'm sure it's adventurous." Lanois was heavily involved with U2's 2009 disc No Line On The Horizon, which didn't live up to commercial expectations.

Superstar producer Steve Lillywhite, who also worked on the disc, recently made headlines when he gently criticized the album. "They did not have the one song that ignited peoples imaginations," he said. "It's a pity because the whole idea of Morocco as a big idea was great. When the big idea for U2 is good, that is when they succeed the most, but I don't think the spirit of what they set out to achieve was translated. Something happened that meant it did not come across on the record."

Lanois says he doesn't totally agree with that assessment. "Steve came in late into the project so he would have a late-in-the-project perspective," he says. "The record started out brilliantly. We were just full of life when we started it in Morocco. Bono wanted to make a gospel record for the future. The first third of the record was filled with delight and we really hit on something special. We spent a long time on it, perhaps too long. The usual pressures came in at the end, like what's the first single going to be and what's gonna be in the set. If we had put out the record coming out of Morocco it would have been an amazing record, even at that stage."

Read the complete article here.


www.rollingstone.com

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Brian Eno on some songs in No Line on the Horizon

Some days ago U2.com posted a video where Brian Eno talked about some of the songs of NLOT.

"Long, drawn out confession" 'I'm here and I'm lost and I don't really know where I'm going...' That's the sense you get with Cedars of Lebanon, the last track on No Line on the Horizon, one of the great, unsung tracks from No Line on the Horizon. A 'lovely piece' says producer Brian Eno, which all started with 'a sample from a record I did with Harold Budd in 1980...'


Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Brian Eno: Interview with U2´s Producer


"Eno is a postman's son," sums up friend and frequent collaborator Daniel Lanois. "He grew up essentially in a peasant environment, but he had a brilliant mind and was able to get to his mountaintop."

"Brian Eno is someone that you don't want to sound stupid in front of, and everything he said, I was just like, 'Wow'," noted (um) Natalie Imbruglia, who recently collaborated with Eno (and Coldplay's Chris Martin) for parts of her comeback album, on the BBC.

Any way you look at it, Brian Eno is one of the preeminent producers and thinkers of our time. Hell, an extemporaneous conversation between him and scholar Richard Dawkins recently packed the house in Oxford, and Eno's as well known these days for his politics, theories, and criticism as he is for his music. Indeed, the once prolific Eno's own output has slowed considerably since the 1970s and '80s, in part due to these extracurriculars and of course thanks to his ongoing work with U2 and Coldplay, something Eno addressed -- in addition to ABBA and Phil Collins -- when he opened some of his packed schedule for a brief conversation.

Pitchfork: Before U2, you were best known for working with more eccentric acts like Talking Heads as well as your own experimental output. Is that why you initially thought Daniel Lanois would be a better fit for the band when they approached you to produce The Unforgettable Fire?

Brian Eno: I had never worked with that kind of music before, and I was not completely convinced that I would be the right person for it. I thought, well, I can handle the ideas side of it all right, but can I handle the actual traditional production side all right? I knew Dan was very good at that side of things, and very good at working with bands, getting the best out of the players and so on, so I said why not have both of us? We'll sort of overlap in some parts, but we actually sort of serve different functions as well. That was how that working relationship started. We had never actually produced anything of anybody else's before, though we had worked together quite a lot. We knew each other well, and we had some respect for each other's different talents. That seemed to me like the ideal situation. We could just do the bits we were sort of comfortable doing.

Pitchfork: The music you were known for at that time was about as far from U2's as possible. What do you think attracted the band to you?

Brian Eno: I think they were very keen on the Talking Heads stuff that I had done. I think they also, dare I say it, liked some of my music! [laughs] The main thing, actually, was that they wanted to go somewhere else. I had this phone call with Bono -- Bono is the greatest salesman of all time, you have to bear that in mind -- where I said to him, "Look, what I'm worried about is that I might change things rather unrecognizably. People might not particularly like the new you that comes out of this."

And he said, "Well, actually we want to be changed unrecognizably. We don't want to just keep repeating what we've done before." He said if we wanted to, we're on track for being a band that just does the kind of records we've done so far. He said we want to do something different from that. He said we wanted to be more -- I forget the word he used, but "cutting edge" was the meaning. I thought, okay, as long as you appreciate that there's a risk involved in that.

After that conversation was when I came up with a plan. I thought, well, I knew that Danny was a great producer, and even if nothing about the working relationship between me and the band worked out, they would still have a really good producer in him. In fact, it worked out very well.

Pitchfork: It's a much easier task to make something recognizable than it is to make something unrecognizable.

Brian Eno: Yes, well, I think very often producers are really trying to repeat things. When they hear something in the new songs that they recognize as being a bit like something that was a success on a previous record, they're inclined to encourage that. Whereas I'm always inclined to encourage things when I haven't heard anything like them before. So when I hear something -- even if it sounds quite clumsy or a little bit unformed -- that makes my ears prick up, and I go "Oh, that's new, I don't know if there's anything like that around," that's what I put my weight behind. I figure the whole of the rest of the world is putting its weight behind the other stuff, the repetition side, the recognizable side. So I sort of want to speak up for the newer stuff.

Pitchfork: Even now, U2 do not always get a lot of credit for recognizing when they need to change tack.

Brian Eno: They have made some significant turnings at various points in their career. They're actually a very experimental band, but because of the form of their music people don't recognize it. If they were some rather obscure indie band, people would probably think, "God, they're amazing, they keep coming out with completely new things!" But because they sell millions of albums, that's how it gets overlooked!

Pitchfork: There's always a catch.

Brian Eno: [laughs] Yes.

Pitchfork: In some ways, making something that's both interesting and popular is the ultimate experiment.

Brian Eno: It's surprisingly unrecognized. I find the same thing in all forms of art, things that are very popular. I think everyone's inherently snobbish. Things that are very popular are not taken seriously, because the snobbish side of one says, "Well, if everyone likes it it can't be that good." Whereas if only I and a couple of other people like it, then it must be really something special.

One of the things I love about U2 -- and it's one of the things that we're constantly arguing about, the balance of this -- is that they want to take everyone with them for the ride! [laughs] They don't want to let anyone go at any point! I'm always saying, "Look, if you're going to do something new, you're going to lose a few supporters along the way." And they really fight against that. They don't want to do that. I honestly don't think it's greed. It's not lust for money or lust for power. It's the feeling that everybody's got to be at the party: we're not going to make it unapproachable to anybody. I'm sure a big part of Bono's drive comes from the times he visits nightclubs -- he does, occasionally -- and sees 18-year-old girls dancing to records that aren't U2! [laughs] And I think that really bugs him! [laughs] I'm not quoting him here, but this what I imagine he's thinking: There's a whole audience here that we're not connecting with! Why aren't we connecting with these people?! So he's quite driven, in that sense, to conquer the world, actually. [laughs]

Pitchfork: And where does he get the reputation for ego and arrogance?

Brian Eno: Well, he has an enormous ego, but so do most of the people I like. [laughs] And also a big ego isn't necessarily a bad thing. A big ego means that you have some confidence in your abilities, really, and that you're prepared to take the risk of trying them out. I really don't think he's arrogant. That's a different thing. In fact, he's absolutely, to me, the opposite of arrogant. He's very, very able, more able than almost anybody I know, to take criticism and do something with it. He just doesn't get upset. He doesn't take it as an attack on him if you say, oh, this doesn't work at all, it's really pathetic, actually. So it's possible to be very frank with him and know there's not some cowering insecurity inside him that is going to mean his feelings get hurt. His ego allows him to be humble, if you see what I mean. People who are very confident in themselves aren't hurt by criticism. They make use of it. I think he's very good at that.

As you can tell, I admire him a lot. He's attacked as a result of another kind of snobbery. We have a particular type of snobbery in England I don't think you have so much in America. Our version: Who does he think he is? The biggest crime in England is to rise above your station. It's fine to be a pop star. Oh, it's great, lots of fun, aren't they sweet, these pop stars! But to think you have anything to say about how the world should work? What arrogance! There's such a resistance to that. Recently he spoke at the Labour Party conference and at the Tory Party conference; I don't think he was there in person. To me, that's completely consistent with his mission. He's driven about his work in Africa, and wants both parties to know that there's an agenda that they should be paying attention to. It's completely consistent. It's not him being power hungry, it's him saying whoever's the next government should be taking this problem seriously.

He received so much criticism here in England, as if he is a political traitor, talking to both parties. And anyway, what right did he have, he's only a pop star! Well, I have no time for that, and I think it all comes out of some kind of awful British envy. Envy is one of the biggest motivators here. It's really heartbreaking to see it stop so much from happening.

Pitchfork: In some way you bore the brunt of similar suspicion and ire when you agreed to work with Coldplay. It even forced people to miss that you made a good record together.

Brian Eno: Well, again, there are ways of playing it safe, and for me playing it safe would be to -- since I don't really need the money -- to work with only sort of critically respectable, obscure, experimental indie bands. Everyone would say, oh, that's fine. I would be that kind of producer who does that kind of thing. But when I met Coldplay and got to know them, I so much liked those people and I so think that they really want to do something. Again, it's like U2 were. They are hungry to do something else. And they will. I'm sure they'll turn out to be a great band.

I'm old enough to remember exactly what happened to ABBA. When ABBA were around, to admit that you liked them would have condemned you to absolute coventry. No one would talk to you because you liked ABBA, because they were considered to be hopelessly pointless pop. Now, of course, everyone likes ABBA. Everyone realizes that they made some great music, and you're allowed to like them now. Kitsch is a way that posh people admit to themselves that they like things that ordinary people like. In my opinion.

Pitchfork: Curiously, ABBA was not nearly as popular in America as they were throughout Europe.

Brian Eno: That's funny. That's interesting. Well, in England and in Europe in general, they were completely popular with the people and totally unpopular with...artists. [laughs] People who were culturally aware. I can remember it very clearly, because I was part of the snobbery! I can remember really liking ABBA songs, and kind of resenting that I did! [laughs]

Pitchfork: It may just be a coincidence, but I noticed that right after you started to work with U2, your own recorded output -- at least what you released -- slowed considerably.

Brian Eno: Certainly working with other people sponges up your time enormously. It's very, very time consuming, and it's kind of idea consuming as well. What often happens is that the ideas you're thinking about anyway end up going on their records. [laughs] Then they don't seem so surprising to you anymore, so you're not that interested in doing them again. So that did happen, I think.

Pitchfork: Do you find contributing to and working with others as rewarding creatively as working on your own music, or is it something different?

Brian Eno: It's different. I often say to people that producing is the best paid form of cowardice. When you produce things you almost always get credit, if it's a good record, but you hardly ever get the blame if it's not! You don't really take responsibility for your work. It's the band who takes responsibility for the work, and taking responsibility for what you do is a very important part of what you do. Living with what you've done, and living with the consequences, is a big part of the deal, I think. Otherwise, why release something? I think when you release something and you put your reputation behind it, you actually finish the work. That's when it's finished. It's finished when it no longer belongs to you. You see it out there with everything else, and you see how it stands, and how it lasts, how people make fun of it or how they adore it. And of course, if it isn't your record, at least if it isn't your name on it in the same way as it would be on your own work, you don't get the benefit of that end of the process.

Pitchfork: Obviously the music you've made has been very influential, but it's tough to name people who are clearly "Brian Eno influenced."

Brian Eno: I don't know. A lot of people tell me they are, but they might be making it up! [laughs] I think if there is an influence, it's not in terms of style so much but in terms of approach to working. For instance, some quite odd people have said, either in interviews or directly to me, that they were influenced by me. Prince, for example, said Another Green World was a very important record for him, apparently, in an interview. I've never met him, so I don't have this from his own mouth, but it was in an interview. Now, that's rather surprising! Hank Shocklee, from Public Enemy, said that their whole thing really started with My Life in the Bush of Ghosts. So that's a very surprising connection, I think. Another very surprising one is Phil Collins! He worked with me in the 70s, and he said it was then that he understood that he could make records himself. He'd always been in a band before, but I always went into a studio with nothing, really, and just kind of made something up there and then. He said he'd never seen anyone work that way, and it really started his solo career. He always thanks me for that.

Pitchfork: That's almost a backhanded complement. "If he can do that, anyone can do that!"

Brian Eno: [laughs] I suppose what it is is that some people have paid attention to the way in which I've worked, or the approach to using the studio, if you like, or the approach to using musical materials that are around. I prefer that kind of influence, really. I don't particularly want loads of copies of me around.

Pitchfork: When you have a band like U2 or Coldplay, in theory they can do whatever they want. They're popular, they're wealthy, that should afford one complete freedom. But there are imposed limitations of stardom.

Brian Eno: Yes, though funnily enough enough that doesn't produce such a strong effect as you would think in the studio. What I think produces a strong effect is the feeling of not wanting to disappoint people. Because one thing you are aware of when you're very popular is how much stock people put in your work. You know that there are 11-year-olds who are saving up to buy your record. [laughs] Though that's probably not true anymore.

Pitchfork: They're probably saving up for a new computer.

Brian Eno: [laughs] But it means that if you want to do something indulgent, just to please yourself, you risk really disappointing someone. I think often that's a big part of how people think. They're thinking there are people to whom these decisions really matter. We shouldn't take them lightly.

Pitchfork: Over the years you've expressed your fondness for African music, and in particular northern African and Arabic music, yet those are elements that rarely explicitly manifest themselves in the music you work on, and especially not in bands like U2 or Coldplay.

Brian Eno: You know what? It's very funny, because on the last U2 album we spent time in North Africa, recording.

Pitchfork: In Morocco, right?

Brian Eno: In Morocco. And the reason none of that really appeared on the record, even though we did quite a lot of stuff there, was because it sounded kind of synthetic. It sounded kind of like "world music" add-on. I'm sure it would have got a few people saying, oh, how interesting, they've broken out into North African music, but actually it just didn't sound convincing. We were very impressed by the music while we were there, but there was no realistic or emotionally satisfying way of marrying it using the music that we were doing, so in the end not very much of it at all showed through. But influences aren't always in terms of sound. As I was saying earlier, they're in terms of how you approach music and what you use it for. I think that was picked up, and it was absorbed.

© Pitchfork Media Inc., 2009

source:http://pitchfork.com/